yeah but if you want to implement it on bitcoin you still would at least need to lock the bitcoin in a multisig somehow
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I think you may be misunderstanding the comparison a bit.
Lightning is a Bitcoin Layer 2 built around channels, routing, liquidity, HTLCs, invoices, etc. It works, but it inherits a lot of complexity from Bitcoin’s architecture.
Sikka isn’t trying to be “Bitcoin but faster.”
It’s a different ledger design entirely:
• no blocks
• no channels
• no routing
• no invoice expiry
• transactions attach directly to a DAG
Honestly, just try it yourself.
Go to:
Create a wallet and send me your address.
I think you’ll be surprised how far transaction architectures have evolved beyond traditional blockchain models.
Sikka Node
Monitor chain status, inspect DAG tips, open the wallet, and manage peers from a local Sikka node.
yeah multisig is teh foundation. lightning is basically just 2-of-2 logic. if u arent holdin ur own keys ur just building another bank tbh. how u been