Heard the same. Crush may be a bit overdramatic though.
Login to reply
Replies (17)
whats the motivation?
Odd. Wonder what’s up Saylor’s sleeve.
If its true then its on the head of the etf changed their mind.... They basically admitted they prefer going to a yacht party then fund devs.
If he is a spook with CIA behind him, not so overdramatic. I mean they have been toppling governments for the past 50 years.
Name names. Sounds bullshitty
![Daniel [dnabg]'s avatar](https://cdn.satlantis.io/1r4rkttvdg7ejak5sfn0vemdkv7rq4r07xyfgd9klwhvl8r65a95s0x98k3-1762702876066-d2430224-775f-44bc-b31d-bf79b1556fd9_02a155a134377ae404344720385884e6a885bf8a188410b04aa21b718d374f46.jpg)
Fidelity or Ark...or both lol
Probably wise not to have an ETF directly fund devs directly though. Science was captured through grants. Devs could begin to work for those that fund them. Better to have a decentralized funding mechanism
He needs to out them.
What Saylor can do against Fidelity, Charles Schwab and Blackrock?
I remember saylor saying microstrategy would support a dev three years ago. I believe it was on McCormacks pod. I don’t know why anyone would support no strings attached funding to an open source dev. I kinda only want to support devs who I think are good for my bitcoin. And they are not all good.
I think I'm ready to slay another hero!!
![[ARCHIVED] Jay's avatar](https://i.nostr.build/9NquibWjyPXiz2Q4.png)
NEW ETHOS: TRUST, DONT VERIFY.
WE SHOULD ALL TRUST THE INFLUENCOORS.
WE MUSN'T VERIFY ANY CLAIMS.
TRUST, DONT VERIFY.
It's clear from Saylor why:
He doesnt want to add resources that have potential to make changes to the perfect asset.
If you listen to him enough, the above would be his logical reasoning.
I disagree with it. Funding bitcoin devs does not necessarily mean changing fundamentals of bitcoin.
Yeah, if I was Saylor (and I am not, wink wink) the only reason why I would go out of my way to stop funding to an open source project is if somehow it will weaken the protocol.
Wont be surprised if Saylor turns out to be the three letter agency psyop. It’s unbelievable to see someone openly speculative attack dollar and not been checked by legacy system in some way. Either he has been handed responsibility to push #bitcoin adoption if USD collapses completely or slow or try to kill #bitcoin if usd survives. Clearly US dont hve enough gold when it’s time to switch to gold standard if fiat collapses so I do believe #bitcoin may be their back up plan.
Then reply to him here. The beauty of Nostr.