We are not using "lightning", we are wrapping a lightning proof into signed events with the sole purpose to identify the parties involved. Yes: forward secrecy doesn't exist, plausible deinalibity don't exist. But not because of some on chain zaps implementation, but strictly because you are singing with public key cryptography and advertising your pubkey key as yourself to everyone. That is the definition of *verifiably* doxxing yourself. You are arguing against pubkey key reuse while reusing the same nostr key to sign the same thing you want a new key for.. nothing here makes any sense.

Replies (3)

I looked at Derick's on-chain zap address.. and the entire set of addresses associated with it. Including an address that has seen over 1 BTC in it's lifetime. on the first level 5 addresses were doxed. On the 2nd level it expands to this. I have no idea how you can think that this is something viable for zaps. That entire cluster of addresses is considered doxed. image