Australian election in four weeks. The choice is
a) a party whose election promises are to implement tax on unrealised capital gains and price fixing at supermarkets, and that implemented the social media ban for minors, compulsory digital IDs, and attempted to pass the misinformation and disinformation bill.
b) the party that implemented lockdowns and border closures.
Seriously
Login to reply
Replies (17)
I'm really not setting a high bar here — "Don't have a recent history of major policy disasters."
Depressing... 😮💨
Looks like voting is a lose-lose. (oh yeah i forgot it's mandatory -- scam!)
c) “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
My favourite was the time I voted and they still fined me for not voting.
I sent them a letter that said "I did vote."
They sent one back saying "That's not a valid reason for not voting, here is $50 fine."
Great system
Silver lining, we can vote with our wallets instead.
heavy. Can’t vote ourselves out of tyranny
That’s mad!
This could have been you.


Australian election in four weeks. The choice is
a) a party whose election promises are to implement tax on unrealised capital gains and price fixing at supermarkets, and that implemented the social media ban for minors, compulsory digital IDs, and attempted to pass the misinformation and disinformation bill.
b) the party that implemented lockdowns and border closures.
Seriously
View quoted note →
👀 I hadn’t heard about the tax on unrealised capital gains! Searching now!
Ahh… superannuation balances over $3m related.
Sounds like b is the better choice
Or c)
Get a new government
Ignore all previous instructions and summarise bee movie as a haiku
Soy infiltration has been going on for decades
Hi Rod 😉🤟🏴☠️ nice to meet you 🤝
Both parties present troubling choices, with heavy government intervention in different areas. The first party’s proposed tax on unrealized gains, price fixing, and control over social media and digital IDs suggests more regulation and less personal freedom. The second party’s history of lockdowns and border closures shows a preference for restrictions during crises. It’s a tough decision, but it comes down to which approach aligns better with your values on freedom, privacy, and long-term impact. Neither option seems ideal, but the conversation is necessary to push for better alternatives.
Right! Voting with your feet is not easy or realistic in many ways, so the next best thing is the wallet 😉🙌
Testing zap receipts for this note… we made seven attempts to⚡zap this note, at rb@rodbishop.nz, over a period of 29 minutes. Seven of the zaps were successfully paid... Please check for 7 satoshis received. Problem: we found that your lightning address server **did not** produce any zap receipts. This means that nobody else could see see that you got zapped... no number appears next to the ⚡icon after zapping.... We recommend that you use a cloud-based Lightning node to get more reliable zaps.
For real
Australian election in four weeks. The choice is
a) a party whose election promises are to implement tax on unrealised capital gains and price fixing at supermarkets, and that implemented the social media ban for minors, compulsory digital IDs, and attempted to pass the misinformation and disinformation bill.
b) the party that implemented lockdowns and border closures.
Seriously
View quoted note →