Not getting vaccinated against certain viruses poses a serious danger to others. You have freedom to do what you want for yourself, but not the freedom to put others at risk.

Replies (13)

You have no right to coerce anyone to take any drug for any reason. At all. If everyone else is inoculated then you're not a danger to them, are you? I can't believe there are still people spouting BS like this now, in 2026. Incredible.
The risk of getting infected by viruses is and was part of life on this planet since the beginning of time. What is worse: A: directly, willingly, without consent, infecting another being by jabbing them with a lucrative product that neither you nor them fully understand, nor it's consequence B: the low chance of indirectly, unknowingly, unwillingly infecting someone with something that has been part of our lifes since the creation of life itself Maybe the missing part in your logic, is that the virus is an infection, but the jab isn't. In reality both are. Now if it comes to evaluating the risk behind both, what it truly comes down to is if you trust in god, life and nature, or in the state, corporations and politicians. This is not a question about health, this is a question about believe.
Everyhing comes with a price (trade-offs). Only the ones with the (monopoly) power of violence have the freedom to put others at risk.
Nymmo's avatar
Nymmo 3 weeks ago
Shouldn't the vaccine you took protect you from said virus? So how would someone put you at said "risk"?
grey 's avatar
grey 3 weeks ago
Either the vaccine works or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t work, there’s obviously no reason to take it (let alone coerce others into doing so) If it does work and you take it, no need to worry about what others do because you’re protected, right? In either case, coercion is not only immoral - it’s also nonsensical.
Default avatar
jedoooshi 3 weeks ago
You also have the freedom to inject yourself with stupid.
Framed this way, isn’t the real issue less about infection and more about where we choose to place trust?