Network effects.
Its not that we have too many bitcoiners, its that bitcoiners hit critical mass and became self-sustaining as a community, with recruitment exceeding attrition.
I think permaculture has crossed that threshold on Nostr, too.
We need more small communities like this.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
That's a good point as well.
I'm doing my part I suppose. Hopefully more small communities grow here as well.
The takeaway here is: Bring your friends!
Network effects.
Its not that we have too many bitcoiners, its that bitcoiners hit critical mass and became self-sustaining as a community, with recruitment exceeding attrition.
I think permaculture has crossed that threshold on Nostr, too.
We need more small communities like this.
View quoted note →
I think what I meant to say is the growing Nostr is not a technical problem to solve.
Its a political campaign to be won, and its the "ground game" of millions of conversations that will win it (and most of those on other media).
The technical side needs to "just work". New features are nice-to-have, but Nostr can win comfortably without them as long as it is stable and welcoming.
The current tech stack supresses some conversations and promotes others. It takes normal networking advantages and puts them on steroids.
It skews the content viewed more than the Twitter algos did.