Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 14
Generated: 17:00:58
The biggest flaw of the pro-Core position, in my view, is that it's purely an appeal to authority, specifically the authority of the Core developers. In Bitcoin, you're supposed to not trust, but verify. But we're being told to trust this group of developers who ram through a controversial change without listening to the community. And you can verify what they're doing, too. This change doesn't need to happen. It's perfectly valid to oppose the changes made in Bitcoin V30. It's sickeningly elitist to suggest that you're not supposed to have an opinion about Bitcoin unless you contribute to the code. That's not how this works.
2025-09-07 13:43:53 from 1 relay(s) 11 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (14)

Yeah, everyone involved somehow in Bitcoin makes his own impact on the future of the protocol. What I meant was that as a node runner by choosing to run a particular implementation / version on Bitcoin code I can make my decision. The same I can do as a miner or hasher, HODLER, trader, whoever else interactions with the protocol.
2025-09-07 14:06:38 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Bitcoin was designed so that no single group has the final say. Core, miners, users, node operators, the checks and balances are the point. Debate is healthy, authority isn’t.
2025-09-08 05:04:18 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply