The biggest flaw of the pro-Core position, in my view, is that it's purely an appeal to authority, specifically the authority of the Core developers. In Bitcoin, you're supposed to not trust, but verify. But we're being told to trust this group of developers who ram through a controversial change without listening to the community.
And you can verify what they're doing, too. This change doesn't need to happen. It's perfectly valid to oppose the changes made in Bitcoin V30.
It's sickeningly elitist to suggest that you're not supposed to have an opinion about Bitcoin unless you contribute to the code. That's not how this works.
Login to reply
Replies (14)
Absolutely π
Node runners decide which implementation of Bitcoin code to run.
Moreover, I think that situations like these in the end strengthen Bitcoin. The sooner they occur the better.
It's a battle of ideas. Noderunners, hodlers, and miners make their own choices. It's not just a battle of which codebase is most correct.
Yeah, everyone involved somehow in Bitcoin makes his own impact on the future of the protocol. What I meant was that as a node runner by choosing to run a particular implementation / version on Bitcoin code I can make my decision. The same I can do as a miner or hasher, HODLER, trader, whoever else interactions with the protocol.
noted.
Lol saw some wild tweets from the crowd but I have to admit being called a knotzi was funny though!
I embrace that label 100%
You're not a coremunist?
Core corrupted by you know whew. They love the kiddos.
Co-sign this message
Bitcoin was designed so that no single group has the final say. Core, miners, users, node operators, the checks and balances are the point. Debate is healthy, authority isnβt.
I've been very hesitant to pick sides in this fight, and definitely don't want to add to the drama. That said, I do think about this a lot...
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspwhtczwk4qfvcdrdcvy44ssce2gyla5m2c70vmg7hqqmg5msahug3vqnh8
Wow, that was quite a read. And I think it's pretty much accurate.
Yes, and the Core developers are acting like they're the most important ones in the space right now.
They are not.
They are captured and should be considered agents against Bitcoin.