BIP-110 is a restrictive soft-fork. Not a permissive hard-fork. Miners will capitulate as soon as activation is mandatory. Or loose ~20% of their revenue for roughly 2% of their current profit due to Arb data on chain. If they do that then Core would be the hard fork. Not BIP-110.
If miners are rational and profit motivated then they will rather loose 2% of their revenue rather than 20%.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
And how a that relevant to the Lightning network that we are talking about here?
True. And sorry I wasn't more clear. I was referring to the assumption of which side would be considered the fork. Your total correct about the issues with lightning channels.