Anarchism doesn't allow for the organized defense of property rights by definition. Otherwise, you're right back at government. Using licenses and legal systems to protect products or property rights is a pretty shitty example of an anarchist. You don't even own products under anarchism for the aforementioned reasons. There's no real way to enforce such a concept as product ownership.

Replies (2)

Anarchism doesn’t oppose governance or legal systems it opposes coercion to take part in any particular structure. It does allow any group to enforce rights within bounds of itself and never in bounds of other groups.