as i said before, there are two types of core supporters.
it has been months, many points are made but still: nostr:note1h8zqqkn3l5edumyj926566wdjet0z4ve44e5k8pyq3tjc2lq4tvswzas8x
Login to reply
Replies (2)
The size limits are censorship argument is retarded. Transaction size limits still exist in v30 mempool policy. Blocksize limits still exist in consensus rules. I'll assume he's talking about censoring non-monetary data via bip444.
The argument that if you "censor" (block non-monetary data) now, you will be forced to censor other things (OFAC?) is also retarded. That only works if there's one node implementation and everyone blindly upgrades it. Node runners choose to not upgrade or to switch implementations, as we have recently seen. If Core v31 had OFAC censorship we would fork off.
Andreas knows this.
also we are not stopping txs by context.
we change the protocol in a way it can't be abused by parasite protocols.