Better to do on solana than bitcoin. Saylor has protected Bitcoin as money so far. I remember him getting some heat about not wanting to fund developers a while back. Well it’s the developers, not saylor, that want to pile more “features” into Bitcoin.
The results of funding devs rain or shine has been a mistake.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
funding open source = bad
promoting shitcoins = good
- jdwagner17
That doesn't seem fair... Open SATs / open spurce is building bitcoin infrastructure and products not trying to change bitcoin via "features". That's a big difference on my opinion
It’s abundantly clear he was right despite the cope
Odell bringing those Xitter vibes over to Nostr