Replies (20)

Hello, if I have several different UTXOs (mixed) in one wallet and I make a transaction, could the receiver see all of my UTXOs in the wallet or just the one they received? Thank you!
Default avatar
cavern harpy 2 years ago
That transaction will only show one utxo but if they all used the same address the reciever can look it up
Default avatar
cavern harpy 2 years ago
The higher the price the less we can stack. Itll inevitably get up there but as far as im concerned the longer it takes the better.
Watched from that perspective the last years' bear market in all asset classes has been nothing special. Fiat show must go on. Turn on the pumps. View quoted note →
They will see only the UTXOs they received. If, however, the change from the transaction should go to an old change address then you will effectively relate this transaction to any prior transaction using that change address. In general new change addresses should be used but depending on the size of the change you may not want that if it will create dust UTXO (a UTXO whose cost of spending at current txn fees exceeds the value of the UTXO).
Would you mind posting your full formula for global m2? It's cut off in the picture.
Payton's avatar
Payton 2 years ago
How does the graph look extended back to the beginning of of QE? Genuine question!
I never thought by putting the y axis on log scale would make it look so linier. Serious money printing incoming!
Win Smith's avatar
Win Smith 2 years ago
Feels like those bands are going to get a lot wider in the coming years - 3 sigma is the new 1 sigma
Default avatar
Taulant 2 years ago
IMO it's unlikely that the expansion will be driven by credit creation this time around. No source of productivity anymore to issue credit for. Most likely direct full banking via central banks and govs. Will be nasty. https://image.nostr.build/cabd0a5c37cce9d903246c5f44a85d24bb23edd04fc81d4d1d4e0fefea34e951.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=852x418&blurhash=ZERp2pkC%25NoftRayxuj%5DxuM%7Bofxua%7DWBj%5DayWBf6_NayaeofM%7Bt7WBj%5Bf6xuWBWBt7ayRjfkofof&x=4f9e97947749e53d37186b4013b764915092a90167a087ded3cc550e6cd21862
Incidentally, I was watching Saylor's conversation with Fridman the other day, and he derives a similar number over a 92 year period.