Reminder ! You don’t discuss this on centralized social media platforms via DMs that are being stored on the Twitter servers😬 
Login to reply
Replies (19)
Not your keys, not your messages.
Reminder ! You don’t discuss this on centralized social media platforms via DMs that are being stored on the Twitter servers😬
View quoted note →
What’s The best way to have a convo like this digitally? I’m convinced signal is compromised. In person only?
I don't know what difference does it make when they have said the exact same thing (word for word) in podcast interviews.
They never hid this.
We have all suspected Twitter is completely compromised. It's nice to actually see that our suspicions are true. Thanks
I mean they got tuckers signal messages. It’s either compromised or his phone was. Likely they have everyones phones backdoored
Yeah I said something yesterday to a mate which probably woke up the German Verfassungsschutz....
My guess is his iPhone was backdoored through Pegasus.
I would not trust my communications to be 100% secure unless it was software I wrote or audited using already established crypto libraries only on devices that are specifically isolated for this purpose
True! But also I wish we could change our keys though!
Same song and dance as charging parents for their adult children's actions, suing firearms manufacturers for shootings, and blasting auto makers for self-induced accidents/injuries.
Anybody can find fault in anything, especially when logic and reason are tossed to the side of the road then left for dead. Critical Thinking is done.
I'm having a hard time understanding how what he said is incriminating.
Am I just retarded?
I also wish we could do that.
Rookie mistake
Research baseband processor backdoors.
Apparently graphene has this covered..
Frequently Asked Questions | GrapheneOS
Carrier pigeons
The other party could be a radicalizing secret agent farming for these responses
I find it interesting that the quote taken omits the part before the underline which is actually exculpatory in my eyes...they're actively saying they're not down with taking the Silk Road path. When combined with the full context it's basically a repudiation of those use cases + basically making an agnostic statement that criminals gonna crime...
Yet you say shit about nostr
this one was far worse IMO.
