It's understandable to try use the stars as proof when you spend no time on the topic, but not even anti-flat earthers use that talking point anymore. Stars actually make a stronger case for a geocentric model. So in fact, the explanation was simple. ๐Ÿ‘

Replies (8)

What this fellow is saying in the clip is just baldly untrue. If you are standing on a flat surface and a dome of stars (or anything) is rotating above you, its apparent rotational direction will not change no matter which way you are facing. The experiment is geometrically equivalent to mounting a clock on your ceiling and then facing in two opposite directions and expecting to see the clock running backwards in one of them. Preposterous!
No, there is a field of view. It's literally modelled right there for you. This isn't exclusive evidence of anything, and you're still intentionally ignoring the experiment I shared. That's rather telling.
The claim is stars wouldn't do the same thing on a 'flat model', but when demonstrated, it's claimed to be false. This is why it is pointless trying to have those discussions. I purposely shared a comprehensive experiment to substantiate the position. The results are pretty clear.
so this is a video of somebody just straight up lying. rather telling if you ask me.... anybody who's ever looked at the night sky knows that the apparent motion of the stars doesn't change if you look south instead of north. are you going to try and explain anything yourself or just share stupid videos?
The point is it is the same on a flat or globe model, which is what you're missing here. This specific point has been discussed ad nauseum in the his space and it's never brought up anymore because it's not a proof of anything. Care to address the experiment I posted, or will you continue to ignore it with whataboutism? I can condede that I don't have all the answers to explain certain points, yet when I present something y'all lose your minds avoiding it at any cost. No concessions for your religion or it all falls apart. Address the experiment. Point out the flaws.
Here's the follow up clip from the discussion. This is using stellerium to model the star rotation. You don't even know the model you're defending. ๐Ÿ˜‚
โ†‘