cool "some lawyers said its ok this one time" clearly that means it could never ever be a problem wtf is wrong with you man? when did NOT thinking adversarialy become ok? I dislike Kratter as much as the next guy but BSV surviving is NOT proof illegal content on the chain will not be an issue. maybe its just nobody cares about BSV...?

The onus is not on me to prove a negative. The onus is on the fearmongers to prove their claims.

🤣

Don't we all agree that the law fair imposed on tornado cash developers and samurai developers is a travesty? And it's that kind of power you're assuming won't be leveraged against CSAM on a node? If software developers are at risk what makes you think that node runners aren't?

Its a lot easier to go after developers than individual node operators so its not really an analogous threat model except that they had guidance that what they were doing was within the boundaries of the law too which reinforces my point that its about *what the state is threatened by* not what precedent says.

Running permissionless p2p software always has and always will come with risks. Adjust your threat model accordingly.