The fundamental difference is between defined benefit (pension scheme) and defined contribution (super). The latter *is* thought of as an entitlement, but the separate accounting makes that closer to the truth?
Ofc, poor overall economic performance will hurt super (in Australia, this means if property prices ever go down, we're screwed).
I suspect the govt will raid the outliers during some crisis ("who needs $10m of super?" they will cry) probably using exit taxation. This political risk from here to my retirement is significant, which is why I've never topped up mine.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Agreed.
I've never contributed more than I was compelled to because of this. I was so disillusioned by the whole scheme that I set up a SMSF and dumped it into Bitcoin before I'd built up much conviction in Bitcoin. The biggest drawcard for me was being able to custody the asset. With hindsight, it worked out well for me.
They're already seeking to tax unrealised gains on superannuation balanced over $3m AUD (Division 296). That $3m figure is not even indexed to CPI, so you can imagine how many will be effected by it over the years.