Sorry, but you're basically saying it's legitimate to destroy infrastructure based on what people believe (that others are inferior), not what they do. This is pure ideology policing. Who decides when dating preferences "convulge with" beliefs about inferiority? Many people think certain political ideologies inherently view others as inferior. Communists think capitalists view workers as inferior. Capitalists think communists view individualists as inferior. Religious people think atheists view believers as inferior. Bitcoin maximalists think shitcoiners as inferior. All of these groups "organize against other people". Does any of this justify hacking their infrastructure? These websites weren't organizing attacks. They weren't planning violence (I really haven't seen any evidence). They were expressing abhorrent opinions in their own corner.

Replies (1)

I think you havent watched the entire talk on the site‘s founder and the people who were on this app - who base their beliefs on eugenicism (if you dont know what that is, you may want to look that one up). Equating this to shitcoiners, religion, etc is just nonsene, sorry. And yes, i do think that communists hacking capitalists who exploit workers is a good thing, just as it is a good thing that capitalists hack communists who want to eliminate individual rights. That’s not „ideology policing“ - it is supporting the freedom of taking direct action against something you dont believe in, which is a right everyone should have access to in a democracy.