I met some of these VCs at nostrica. Do you think there is a misalignment of incentives between VCs (person or funding) and an open permission-less ecosystem? VCs want to capture and dominate market as it is the best way to make profits, which is a centralization risk. On the other hand, Nostr yearns to have community-driven governance with a much lower time preference than typical VC cycles. I’m not saying VCs are dirty. The ones I met were really awesome people. I’m saying there may be forces out of their control that they have to succumb to that puts the openness of Nostr at risk. Curious to hear your thoughts on this.