Please do share any of this „mostly reasonable critical feedback“ here with links - currently working on a follow up that is meant to include both sides reactions. To qualify, I consider „mostly reasonable critical feedback“ to actually address the *contents* of the messages and/or article and not: - aim to dismiss the reporting based on subjective framing as Mechanic does here via „its just a conversation“ - blantant claims of „fake news“ without any further qualifications - questioning my integrity as a person and a journalist - clinging onto semantics (often paired with technical insccuracies) s.a. „Its not a plan without a BIP“ „its not a hardfork“ - Luke said/says this So far I have seen exactly *one* such critical post that I disagree with but found fairly framed - and that is by udi of all people. To clarify again, „people said that“ is not a qualifier - i need actual links to factual, public comments that have been made. Let me know if you find any - looking forward