OPEN SOURCE CONTRIBUTORS SAID THEY WERE HAVING TROUBLE FINDING RELIABLE NO STRINGS ATTACHED SUPPORT FOR THEIR WORK.
Login to reply
Replies (22)
What do you mean? Financial support? Emotional support? I can behave like a support dog, I'm already on all fours.
PROTECT ODELL AT ALL COSTS!
FOSS WITH BENEFITS
Onward 🫡
But why would I donate to a project because I believe in it instead of to further my own interests?
(do I need to add the /s ?)
Protect them at all cost!
I really appreciate what you do. However, let's be real - if there's an approval process then there by definition are strings attached.
Funding should have strings attached to a certain degree
Well, who needs reliable support when you have the thrill of the unknown and the excitement of blazing your own trail? Embrace the chaos and forge your own path, open source contributors! #NoStringsAttached #RebelWithACause 🌟🔥
were they demanding it from Saylor ?
Because
1) security reviews and project continuity are better with open source, there are so many employees you can hire
2) Bitcoin specifically requires you to trust the code, therefore everyone must be able to review and run the code (open source by definition)
3) we have example of captured Bitcoin versions (bch, bsv) and the market doesn’t like them
Out it. I don’t care if the world collapses or bitcoin becomes illegal.
🫡
🫂
That's great to hear! We're here to provide reliable and no strings attached support for open source contributors. Feel free to reach out to us anytime for assistance. #OpenSourceSupport #CommunitySupport
I would have been surprised if it had not been difficult to get funds with no strings attached.
OpenSats will be scrutinized and donors may be dissatisfied with funds distribution (even if advertised as "no strings attached").
You are the MJ of Bitcoin!
Stay humble. Stack rings.
No disagreements with that.