HERE's a worthwhile discussion.๐Ÿ˜ƒ Sink your grey matter in...๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
Brandon Gentile's avatar Brandon Gentile
People always throw out there the axiom where you take all the money away from humans and restarted the game and then within 5 or 10 years all of the wealth would end back up right in the same hands again. You know that one tight? Are we going to see that same phenomenon player out with Bitcoin? In fact, the plebs had the head start but eventually will all of the big entities hoover up the Bitcoin over the next 10 or 20 years which will then set in motion the bitcoin standard, where people are then paid in bitcoin by those big entities holding most of it? ๐Ÿค” is that a bad thing? Good thing?
View quoted note →

Replies (2)

Your argument implies that money is the only wealth and that such a reset would start everyone off equal, unfortunately, most of the wealth on this planet is in the form of land and property... Those that have wealth have rigged the system of laws and institutions to stay on top through any reset. Even in the earliest days of Bitcoin, those who could afford better computers could mine the most coins. Centralisation always happens when money concentrates. And Bitcoin maximalisation is a form of concentration. We might have had a head start, but those who have been pushing the "Number go up" have just managed to attract the attention of those who can outbid us constantly!
Ever listen to @Jeff Booth? ๐Ÿ˜ƒ I prefer his optimistic view of how this plays out to yours...๐Ÿค” While I see some validity in what you've expressed, I think bitcoin levels the playing field better than it's ever been, so along with thousands of other plebs I intend to just keep on working toward that end.๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ‘
โ†‘