Slight tangent here, David, but I think this approach works in the religious sphere as well. Orthodox enough (within consensus rules) not to be excommunicated but free spirited enough to question what needs to be questioned.
“nostr … leaves questions of consensus up to custom implementations, in both client and relay”
Login to reply
Replies (1)
exactly. that's the thing that shitcoiners and fedis don't get. consensus is not everything. divergence of opinion needs to be protected as much as it needs to be exposed to opposition. you can't have that with a protocol that forces comingling.