:P's avatar
:P yesterday
The fact that open sats is trying to improve bitcoin is the problem. What don’t you get? The ironic thing is you did help address core’s centralization problem by getting people to switch to knots. Bitcoin developers shouldn’t be funded at all. The fuck is wrong with you.

Replies (3)

What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you think shit in this world just magically happens? Who are you to tell me I can't donate my sats to a developer if I want to? That's the crux of my issue here. You're telling other people they shouldn't do what they want with their own money (or even have a different opinion than yours) in a free market for an open source project. You don't have to run the code. You could go work for free. Don't apply the maintenance, security patches, or upgrades. The truth is that you still get all of that running Knots but sit here on your fucking high horse wagging your fingers telling people they're wrong for making a donation to someone building shit they want. You're catastrophising and using hyperbole as an argument and I'm resisting it. You can take that feedback or not, but that doesn't mean there's something wrong with me. Gas lighting doesn't work with me.
And I'm tired of seeing (yes, imperfect) people get shit on when they've given me more than you have. That's all I'm saying here. The biggest danger is burning these producers out because they can't please every sensibility of people like you.
> Bitcoin developers shouldn’t be funded at all. if they do not get ethical independent funding with no strings attached then they will seek out worse funding from questionable people, such as epstein do you think open source nostr devs shouldnt be funded either? or you cool with that because they are your friends