But yes, I'm aware of this. Still, you get to decide where the value is for you. If your work which you value is copied and used/shared without you getting any credit, somebody decided for you without you. Highly unethical, wouldn't you agree?
Anyway I discussed it twice with my husband (9sirtom5) in the thread, and later the op sent me a video about giving a credit. That's my point. My man stresses out the "theft" thing, because he's deeply bothered by the state intervention with laws. I get that, but that wasn't my focus.
As with @The Beave I think we're on the same board, but there's some levels of communication I missed him, my man, probably you too. It's highly improbable I'd miss the point with several anarchists. I'm stressing out the respect for own property and getting credit for hard work if it's required. Not haa haa ctrl c in your face, as I understood from all those notes.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
It is unethical, and I vaguely agree about crediting, but I am of the opinion that if it was really "property" you didn't wish to be copied you wouldn't make it copy-able in the first place, or you would distribute it only to people you trust to not copy. If it's property, it should be protect-able.
If someone CAN Ctrl + C they will, crying about how it's mine and you can't, is just kindergarten arguments at that point.
I agree with all you wrote. My trigger was an old stupid poem and stupid video which I personally hate to the bone, because it doesn't explain any of this. Respect to the property is one of my main beliefs.
I think I kinda missed that explanation of your book there, it's a translation thing. How do you plan to proceed with selling it? Or, as an "amateur" (meaning unsponsored professional), will you just give it away and hope for sats? With podcasts or live music it's so much more obvious than with a book.