maybe. i don't pretend to understand the complexities of the composition (though there are signs) because it doesn't matter - the downstream effects and patterns of behavior are identifiable and avoidable, regardless of those details. there is a cybernetic aspect to it:

Cybernetics - Wikipedia

> "...where the effects of a system's actions (its outputs) return as inputs to that system, influencing subsequent action"

I agree, but I understand that naming things helps to understand them more clearly and make better decisions based on that. My previous answer was more of an addition, another way of looking at the duopoly issue.