Replies (2)

Diyana's avatar
Diyana 3 weeks ago
I don’t see 5G as uniquely controversial… it’s more like an inflection point. Earlier generations already introduced chronic EMF exposure. What’s changing now is density, proximity, and saturation. More antennas, higher frequencies, more devices, less recovery time for biological systems. So it’s not “5G vs 4G”… it’s cumulative load on organic life, and we’re clearly past the threshold where it’s negligible.
They were not, there were lawsuits in Italy literally 15 years ago. The difference is that 5G antenna arrays Are way more energetic, to the point where standing in front of one with beamforming off is like standong in front Of a 25kW microwave. Which you will not survive for very long. TLDR: lots of data needs lots of power going through your body.