You haven't thought hard enough about this to be criticizing. Luke is a devout Catholic who has repeatedly said the church is right by virtue of it being the church. That same church moved people who it knew molested children to protect them from prosecution. Moved them into new positions where they had the exact same opportunities to molest children again, which they did. I could sort of understand "I believe Catholic doctrine but they church itself has made mistakes" but that isn't what we have here. So this guy who throws down to support that organization in a black or white way wants to bully everyone into allowing censorship on bitcoin over hypothetical CP. If he gave a fuck about the children he wouldn't support his church the way he does. So what does he really want? Am I pushing a boundary here? Maybe. They called me a pedophile based on only not supporting their censorship scheme. I'm just countering with receipts that their leader openly supports an organization that was convicted of numerous crimes against children. They are throwing stones from a glass house.

Blaming a regular Catholic for what the clergy did is incredibly unfair. There are plenty of other demographic markers that could be used to predict CSA that would be above any rate for all Catholics compared to the gen pop. I assume you don't accuse every step parent you meet of being a paedophile?