Its the first emergency soft fork with a goal of preventing legal blowback.
It normalizes consensus-level behavioral gating for “safety”. That’s an open door for later parameterization under new banners (AI-safety, “public health”, carbon, “foreign influence”, “exclude sanctioned payload types for safety”, “restrict non-KYC script paths for safety”, etc).
Lawmakers can simply point to “Bitcoin already excludes Y”, and press for Z (e.g., “exclude sanctioned payload types”, “restrict non-KYC script paths”). You’ve demonstrated precedent and capability.
Even a temporary soft-fork normalizes the idea that “Bitcoin can move for safety”.
Political attack surface increases either way
- Fail path: “You refused; now we must legislate.”
- Pass path: “See? You acknowledged duty of care. Now make it permanent and broader.”
Login to reply
Replies (1)
OK. I now understand your argument and think it's valid.
Then what's the best path forward, in your opinion?
The answer isn't obvious to me.
My gut tells me that there must be a better "compromise" technical solution that hasn't been proposed yet.