I’m suggesting you are outsourcing your thinking to others at significant bandwidth burden on other human minds over relatively simple things that an LLM is better suited to helping you understand than a human.

Replies (1)

I advocate for bitcoin. I talk to people and try and persuade them rationally why bitcoin is good for them. the same standards i hold myself to in my advocacy for bitcoin, i hold to other advocates to. if i thought of that work as beneath me, then i wouldn’t be an advocate. if i thought everyone else was just retarded and didn’t get this simple obvious thing, then i would be a horrible advocate infact, when I have thought others as just retarded for not getting something, it’s been an indicator that i’m missing a part of the picture. it signals to me that i have oversimplified reality. perhaps that’s a takeaway from these exchanges. it’s never a bad idea to reassess your assumptions and ask “what am i missing?” one of the ironic things about being philosopher, i don’t walk around pretending i’m an amazing computer scientist, doctor, or aeronautical engineer. but yet every computer scientist, doctor, and aeronautical engineer i’ve ever met, thinks they are an amazing philosopher.