@L0la L33tz any comments?
Login to reply
Replies (3)
You expect her yo be able to converse with anyone about the technical details around Bitcoin? Don't hold your breath.
Just another scammer.
If technical details is what she is lacking then that would imply that her story wasn't intentional slander and that it was simply ignorance in her interruption of the alleged text messages. I give her the benefit of the doubt she's not scammer, she does a lot of good reporting on global concerns in regards to privacy to which most of the Bitcoin community sadly ignores.
The Urdi's interruption of the Luke's messages is pretty nuanced in details, assuming this favorable interruption is correct. Luke's intentions is to remove CP while still maintenaning the transactions are still valid using Zero Knowledge Proofs thus avoiding the need to fork the network. Now is this technically possibly? I don't know, is the proposed solution free of contraversy? Probably not, does it reintroduce trust, yes technically clients would need to trust the people determining the filter.
But one thing is for sure ego makes it hard to admit when we are wrong, so it's unlikely for L0ala to continue this dialogue.
OP_Return data is prunable, so maybe Udi's interruptation of Luke's message a little out there idk