Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 4
Generated: 14:32:39
People massively underestimate how huge Bitcoin’s proof-of-work really is. Let’s take a theoretical maximum of global general-purpose compute: 📱 Smartphones (~4B @ ~500 h/s) → 2 × 10¹² h/s 💻 Laptops/PCs (~1B @ ~10 kH/s) → 1 × 10¹³ h/s 🏢 Enterprise servers (~100M CPUs @ ~50 kH/s) → 5 × 10¹⁵ h/s 🏭 Global datacenters (cloud + hyperscalers + gov compute) → ~2–5 × 10¹⁶ h/s Add everything: 🔢 TOTAL GLOBAL GENERAL-PURPOSE COMPUTE ≈ (3–6) × 10¹⁶ h/s Now compare to the real networks: – Bitcoin: ~1.1 × 10²¹ h/s – Zcash: ~1.5 × 10¹⁰ h/s – Monero: ~3 × 10⁹ h/s Here’s what actually matters: Bitcoin’s hashrate is ~20,000× larger than the combined hashrate of all phones + all laptops + all enterprise servers + all datacenters on Earth. But the same “global compute pool” is: 🔥 ~2,000,000× bigger than Zcash 🔥 ~10,000,000× bigger than Monero This is the entire point: Bitcoin operates at an ASIC-industrial, planetary scale. Zcash and Monero operate at a scale where a big tech company—or a government—could realistically overpower them. Different scale. Different threat model. Different destiny. image
2025-11-23 13:33:26 from 1 relay(s) 3 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (4)

The total chainwork – the cumulative proof-of-work spent on the Bitcoin blockchain since the beginning – is about 7.66 × 10²⁸. 76,647,996,044,134,875,589,437,816,832 to be exact at block height 924,870. This is the largest computation ever done in human history. 😎
2025-11-23 16:50:47 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Comparing hashrate without taking into account different algos? Your numbers are verifiable, but meaningless as your conclusions can hardly been taking seriously without mentioning that you compare apples and oranges. Newbie mistake!
2025-11-24 16:38:11 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply