He also has bosses that will pivot their asset to match circumstances. We can see in hindsight that poisoning the space with shitcoinery was a much better and more developed attack.

Bitcoin cohereion is one vector of attack as well, there are multiple paths they took to keep the technology and get rid of the ideology.

To me from an intelligence point of view, why would you divest from any vectors of attack. The BTC danger isn't that it's uncensorable, it's the ideology, the shitcoin attack was to show anything can be BTC and that failed and they would have obviously make contingency plans for that. Simply put the focus shifted from changing the protocol to how it's integrated in purchases and the broader fiat system. Those investments are actively going on and the proof is Black Rock buying up BTC miners, Coinbase ownership, forced Binances to be sold via the US government and sitting on boards of every major dealer of BTC including Microstrategy and Jack Dorseys Cashapp. The attack didn't stop guys.

I don't see this email exchange in other Epstein docs and will delete it because it might be fake.

Sorry for deleting my post, the email exchange with Peter Theil is not verifiable (none of the Epstein releases by the DOJ are, as expected because they aren't acting in good faith) 💯 The attacks won't stop. ETFs are shitcoinery 2.0. "Regulatory clarity" is the Strategy of Saylor's ilk. And incorporation of "bitcoin companies" amounts to deputization by the state to..attack bitcoin.