Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 14
Generated: 15:46:35
#AskNostr #Ask_Nostr Does anyone know a good alternative to Timeshift on Ubuntu? It doesn't work properly on either my Ubuntu machine, or the Linux Mint one. I'm running bareback, which is never a good idea with Linux...
2025-02-21 17:11:46 from 1 relay(s) 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (14)

Not sure, what you mean by "takes the snapshot from zero". Do you have different subvolumes defined (and mounted) in your BTRFS filesystem for / and /home (plus maybe some more)? Creating a ro snapshot of a subvolume should be instant. Only if you want to send/receive it somewhere else, should it take time (depending upon the amount of data to be transferred).
2025-02-23 20:06:45 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
nostr:npub1s277u5rww60te98w9umz6p7pjcxuus96cegdsf4y978qcqvu8jtq88dsym If restic appears fit for your purpose, then maybe BTRFS isn't the right tool anyway? Borg Backup (another feature rich and popular backup tool) could also be the right thing for you then.
2025-02-23 20:13:42 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
I meant that it doesn't simply take an existing snapshot and "updates" it, which is a relatively quick process. It does a full scan, like when you do it for the first time, which takes a very long time. I think it's a permissions problem actually. Don't worry, I'll figure it out! Thanks
2025-02-24 20:07:17 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
As I wrote, when you _create_ (take) a snapshot of your btrfs subvolume (which could be mounted to "/" for example) it's quite literally "instant". Only when you want copy/send this snapshot to another filesystem or disk it will take some time, even if you copy/send incrementally, so only the blocks changed since the reference snapshot. Maybe you're not using a reference snapshot at all? In which case all data (not only the modified blocks) in the current snapshot would have to be transferred. In any case, happy tinkering 👍
2025-02-25 22:46:27 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply