So, the CSAM is not possible. Yes or no? Currently. Without BIP 110?
Login to reply
Replies (8)
Peter Todd already proved you can get around the filters, at least the last time I checked in. There will always be circumvention methods. If you want a guarantee that CSAM will never be on a chain, then you will have an unprecedented, centralized governance structure retroactively acting as a node morality police.
CSAM is possible, but it will be once BIP110 lifts after a year and nobody made any progress, because these retards have escalated their rhetoric and vitriol.
Peter Todd is a CIA agent. Satoshi fucked off as soon as Gavin did his presentation to Langley; fuck off🤷🏻♂️.
I can't really stop his proof from being true, regardless of who he works for.
It's possible. With or without 110.
The only thing 110 does is make it non-contiguous, while ensuring it also has to bloat the UTXO set. But it's still accessible to those who know to look for it.

Bitcoin Optech
Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #379
This week’s newsletter shares an analysis comparing the historical performance of the OpenSSL and libsecp256k1 libraries. Also included are our r...
Did find this though while looking. May make for some amusement in the brief window after the chainsplit before the first 51% attack. Asssuming such a window actually exists.

GitHub
GitHub - djkazic/bpub: encoding data on bitcoin using valid compressed pubkeys
encoding data on bitcoin using valid compressed pubkeys - djkazic/bpub
