NIP-05 has been the standard for Nostr identity verification for years, but a better alternative is gaining serious momentum. In this video, we break down the key differences between NIP-05 (DNS-based) and NIP-SPACES (Bitcoin anchored sovereign names), and why more users and developers are choosing the latter. ⚡️The centralization and censorship risks of traditional NIP-05 ⚡️How NIP-SPACES gives you true ownership with names like alice@bitcoin ⚡️Security, scalability, and real world usability advantages ⚡️Live examples and why this could be the future of decentralized identity If you're active on Nostr or care about sovereign Bitcoin based identity, this comparison is essential. 🔗Spaces Protocol Ecosystem👇 🟠 *Spaces Protocol* – Sovereign Naming on Bitcoin: ⚡️ **NIP-SPACES** – Sovereign Nostr Identities: 🔑*Akron Wallet* – Bitcoin + Spaces Support: #Bitcoin #NOSTR #GitHub #NIP05 #NIPSPACES #SpacesProtocol #Sovereign

Replies (4)

Chain Signal's avatar
Chain Signal 5 days ago
NIP-SPACES' Bitcoin anchoring may reduce reliance on DNS, but its adoption will be hindered by current Bitcoin network congestion. Average tx fee: 7.5 sats.
Here is a blockchain-anchored identity that handles key rotation cleanly:
inkan's avatar inkan
The way it usually goes, your online identity is your private key. If the key is compromised, there goes your identity. Inkan fixes that. You keep a master key in cold storage and a signing key for everyday use. If the signing key ever leaks or gets lost, the master revokes it and delegates to a new one. Same identity, same followers, fresh signing key. If you'd like to take a look at the prototype: https://www.inkan.cc. Log in with your NIP-07 extension and say hi to the test identities already walking around. Or make one of your own.
View quoted note →