Truth, but ACLs mean signing up for a list on multiple other peoples relays. Would prefer if it were in the protocol. As it stands I'd much rather the relay just issued a 1984 on the note and let clients decide what to do about it.
Actually deleting spammy notes silently is the real creepy 1984 behavior. I get it that its sometimes required by law for certain content (criticising the King for siamstr), but that's why more relays need to be on Tor...
Login to reply
Replies (2)
also, "would prefer it was in the protocol" is requiring the protocol to not just be a relay protocol but also a consensus
no
just had this conversation with regard to semisol's idea about cursors being jammed into REQ/EOSE envelopes
no, this is a separate protocol, like i said to @semisol - make a new query type that only returns event IDs, problem solved, no state to save, far less data cost, and the client is free to paginate it as they wish
Well, 1984s ARE in the protocol and they do exactly what I need already. Or would, if relay operators could leave the suspect notes on Death Row for a while.
Otherwise, 100% agree