You are evading the very real issue of serving block content by bragging about your mempool. A transient problem with a bandaid but a permanent problem remains. Maybe you should have read what I wrote in this thread at least before calling names. You are wrong to say I didn't say that and anyone who can read can see you didn't bother. I'm not a dev but I can see the problem. As long as knots fanboys are celebrating solving a problem they haven't solved and core devs don't GAF no one is even looking or trying to find a real solution. So I bust my ass trying to raise the issue and all I get is morons on both sides calling me names and dodging the issue.

Replies (2)

Knots proposed and has implemented a solution to rate limited Ordinals. Spam is a cat and mouse game you have to fight on the mempool level, to not drift towards censorship. I think it's valid to say that the quantity of spam on the chain is a relevant factor and if we can reduce 99% of that it's a good outcome. It makes a difference if the network makes an effort to reduce this behavior or if it opens itself up to it with all guards down.
I didn't say I solved the goddamn problem in any kind of final way. This issue is about mempool sovereignty. It is NOT about a complete solution to spam. Core are being intellectually dishonest and subverting mempool sovereignty, so that takes precedence in the goals of the clued in and responsible among us Knots fans. I never claimed to have all of the answers. You are probably projecting your own arrogance or grouping me in with people I have little in common with. A real solution to the problem is secondary to the immediate threat that is posed by Core's bullshit. You would be wise to actually engage intellectually with individuals like myself. I have given you the same consideration you gave me, and then some. You can go on assuming bad faith, or you can grow the fuck up and realize there's more to people's goals than just trying to shut you up. It's not all about you. I happen to have very serious reasons to prioritize what I do, but I am open to discussing long term solutions for later down the line, like a consensus change.