It’s not just about the capability. Sure you can spin up your own janky client but not sure that helps the ecosystem or grow Nostr. We’d be better off if there was more collaboration on projects, or at least a better balance between forking something for yourself versus contributing to other projects. Started working on this. I’m sure there are others with extra ai subscription capacity at the end of the week that could point their clanker to well scoped issues on projects they like.
I had started building something I'd love feedback on: **PRana** 🐟
It's a directory of opt-in NIP-34 git repos that surfaces their actually-open issues, tagged by complexity, so you can grab one and fix it.
The idea: a lot of us have idle AI-subscription quota that's use-it-or-lose-it. PRana routes that spare capacity to vetted backlog items across nostr git projects. Not "donate your tokens" (you can't), just a smart worklist that points you at a good small task.
The name comes from PR + piranha: a swarm of contributors stripping a shared issue backlog clean.
Already working: signature-verified fetch, a status resolver that figures out which issues are really open, a claim primitive (so two people don't burn capacity on the same issue), and a web UI with claim + clone.
Would love some feedback, and if anyone wants to build on it, come say hi. 🐟
https://gitworkshop.dev/npub1xy54p83r6wnpyhs52xjeztd7qyyeu9ghymz8v66yu8kt3jzx75rqhf3urc/relay.ngit.dev/prana/tree/main/README.md
View quoted note →
https://gitworkshop.dev/npub1xy54p83r6wnpyhs52xjeztd7qyyeu9ghymz8v66yu8kt3jzx75rqhf3urc/relay.ngit.dev/prana/tree/main/README.md
