Nick Szabo, the intellectual father of blockchain thinking (Bit gold, smart contracts, digital scarcity, trust minimization, adversarial thinking) and according to some of Bitcoin itself, has never contributed to Bitcoin *CORE*, therefore he’s a retard that doesn’t understand and it’s not qualified to lean on spam.
YOU LITERALLY CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP 🤦♂️
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (4)
You realize that Core is just a rename of the original bitcoin project, which Nick Szabo has no technical contributions to either. Right?
With the exception of Luke, your argument relied on thoughtworkers who have no demonstrated ability to safely change bitcoin the way you and your hairshirt mob think it should be changed, and that's why no part of the spam discussion is, at this point, serious. Luke alone is far from enough for rough consensus.
And you call me a shitcoiner, but I can tell you from experience you sound exactly like every other raving crusader who forked off into shitcoin irrelevance.
If OP isn't a cORe cOnTRiBuToR, I guess they/thems opinion doesn't matter either. 🤡🤔🤣
lol, you realize Nick invented and put into practice a great amount of the things modern Core contributors jerk off to today, back when some of them were still in kindergarten. Your thinking seems to treat the students as more competent than the teachers — and that includes both Jimmy and Luke, who are among the most experienced Bitcoin devs. The amount of mental gymnastics you and your little crew of Marxists perform to elevate the devs you like while disqualifying the ones you don’t is honestly laughable at this point. Anyway, not gonna waste more time on your opinions from now on.
If you think Jimmy Song is one of the most experienced devs in bitcoin, I think that's all I need to know about ypur understanding of the situation. Please feel free to air that opinion. It's a very good signal.