It doesn’t matter too much because existing consensus rules already allow spam.
It would take a consensus change (rather than just node-relay behavior) to truly limit spam that people are willing to pay for, which is unlikely to get broad enough support.
I would not support consensus changes to allow or incentivize more spam. Such a stance can only be supported if one is long-term bearish on monetary/settlement demand.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
So, spam filters work, but not completely. And the op_return debate is still reasonable to have? I'm still puzzled about what would happen in the case of continuously orphaned blocks.