Potentially.. with all the methods of communication we have... The one we are on, being one of them. permissionless, unstopable, nostr can be equal or more private. I was really hoping for a more robust example. What am I missing in your view?

My only point is that it's foolish to tear down functionality just because a subset of its uses are annoying. Spam doesn't break Bitcoin and that's a proven fact. Illicit material on the blockchain can't break Bitcoin because no government's authority spans the whole internet. Spam can't make the blockchain grow faster than blocks full of monetary transactions can. None of the arguments hold water. And the fact that there is a small group of people that uncommonly militant about this and trying to get as many people on board with the soft forks using any means necessary only adds to my suspision that the functionality they're trying to kill is more important than people think and worth defending.

Eth is a better use case for this. It’s a slippery slope to start accepting spam of any form on chain. Eventually nodes won’t be able to run the software without major upgrades to their hardware… It’s a major attack vector for a decentralized network. It would collapse it eventually.