You seem to be arguing agreeing to ANY government action that affects the affairs of its citizens is the same thing in principle to agreeing to EVERY government action, no matter vastly different those actions might actually be in their factual details or the purposes of it. But that is not a good argument. My philosophy about government is as follows: image

Replies (1)

Yes. The same thing in principle at bottom, vastly different in tactics in the moment. one's focus must shift between tactics and principle; but the State and tribal thinking would drown you in tactics so you don't recognize the failed principles. I disagree with almost every part of that quoted message, but I see your point and understand why you feel the way you do. (my stance, specifically, unsurprisingly, is: the amount of "top-down authoritarianism" that i think is maximally necessary for bottom-up, free market emergence of human flourishing and peaceful order is "zero". the inevitable slippery slope starts an atom above that) getting distracted 100% of the time by tactics is how you end up thinking that _any_ amount of top-down authoritarianism is acceptable.