American Hodl makes a great point here. And that's what I've been trying to do in my life. And what I keep posting here as well. For important decisions, I check with trailer-park-born Lyn, and then check with like, mathletes captain Lyn or whatever the fuck she's up to these days, when analyzing things. I'm only confident when both of those agree. And then after much time thinking and building a coherent view, my husband often calls that view retarded, so I have to argue it better and get it through his arguments to reach its final form. View quoted note →

Replies (10)

Great insight. Spouses can be noticeably unempressed with us. Its refreshing in a fake world. I love that my wife and I are so close that we don't bs each other.
It’s why I have a policy to battle test major life decisions by getting wasted and discussing it with loved ones all night after previously analyzing it to death sober. If the two agree, you’re good to go. It’s the quantum tunneling test.
Kush's avatar
Kush 10 months ago
I like the approach. I’m too maverick for my own good. I articulate my gut instinct joining dots to make my moves. I think that why I appreciate considered, dispassionate commentary soooooooo much
Then one of us is wrong. I alone have the “publish” button. We tackle every detail in debates and grant the others’ good points, so we rarely hit a standstill. Usually we end up agreeing. It doesn’t take much. Standstills mostly result from people who don’t want to debate or who can’t debate. We don’t have that issue. Covid vaccination was our longest debate, still ongoing, but it no longer affects macro. And my main point was that nobody should be forced to get it. And we joke about it now, like my liberal mom who is more left than both of us sent me a serious text saying not to get an MMR booster since I almost died from it as a baby, so I sent it to my husband like “apparently here’s my origin story as a conservative anti-vaxxer, btw”. So if we disagree on a material post, I feel the need to argue it and sometimes slightly reword it, after his pushback. It makes the article better. But should we somehow still disagree, I’m the one that presses publish on all my platforms. The final arbiter. He has final say elsewhere in many other areas. But I’ve never had to publish without his blessing. I analyze and tweak to get his agreement, because he’s a great critic.
Bewlay's avatar
Bewlay 10 months ago
Street smarts versus Dr Spock
Default avatar
npub18k48...q0qf 10 months ago
Depends on what you mean by “forced”. Forced means someone or something held you down and injected you. Forced does not mean a job requirement, not being able to go to a restaurant or a concert. The American mindset has gotten so weak that we complain about being “forced” when we are not. We have become a bunch of bitches.
curt finch 's avatar
curt finch 10 months ago
That's pretty fabulous I listen to people who focus on what is and what is likely to be rather than what should be Should is very stressful You, George Friedman, Dr Sarah Payne of the Navy college for example