No, I didn't ask that question, nor am I seeking to answer it. In a complex argument it is always possible to derail a valid answer by changing the argument. You just did that. Your points are valid and you are raising them, but I am not, nor am I offering to answer them. None of the above invalidates my point, which is still 100% true and correct. Also, I sound like Jameson Lopp right now, which is disturbing me immensely ๐Ÿ˜‚

Replies (1)

I didn't derail anything. The entire premise is based on the answer to the question I first asked. "How do you reduce spam on the blockchain?" You may not have an answer to that question and that's fine. But the position you hold (reduce spam) absolutely depends on an answer to that question, which in reality doesn't have a good answer.
โ†‘