Agreed, however the definition of Bitcoin remains undefined, it’s broadly “agreed” that every the user defines it. Every single actor has their own definition of Bitcoin, yet the physical transformation constructing every block, utxo and transaction is not subjective, it’s objective. We don’t actually understand the objective physical transformation of Bitcoin. Every protocol change remains subjective because of this. You don’t engineer systems based on subjectivity, and we risk destroying the thing we seek to preserve forever due to folly over jpegs. If Bitcoin is something bigger than “money”, the devs ought to know. Such a definition just might humble all of us again. 🤷‍♂️ just my opinion.

What is this, primacy of the lead developer's consciousness? Answer this one question: is the exchange rate of a loaf of bread to dollars at Store A objective?