I guess we are at stalemate.
Yes. There’s risk in custodial I’m not denying that. That’s not my argument here.
My argument is calling ecash tokens bitcoin. When they are by very definition not. And I’ll stand by that part of the statement.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
That's moving the goal posts. I have agreed this entire time that eCash is not Bitcoin. Said it right out the gate here that custodial Lightning is just as much an IOU as eCash:
nostr:nevent1qqsgz45fmyxjnumavl3cjk4whlenjktcankn4lacnvcuy54q8drutacprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnjd9nksarzdak8gtnwv46z7q3qkun5628raxpm7usdkj62z2337hr77f3ryrg9cf0vjpyf4jvk9r9sxpqqqqqqz9qclq3
Neither one is Bitcoin has been my contention all along.