“Bitcoin Core v30 installed the “Problem” component of the “Problem → Reaction → Solution“ chain (Hegelian dialectic) that Elizabeth Warren’s bosses so desperately needed.
If default mempool policy widens data payloads (e.g., OP_RETURN from ~80 bytes to very large envelopes), the content-liability lever strengthens.
One documented wave of illicit payloads → a policy letter to clouds and ISPs:
“Treat non-attested Bitcoin nodes as potential content distributors”.
Overnight, most retail and enterprise nodes face terms-of-service risk and vanish, leaving only approved providers.
I’ve already written about how Bitcoin’s developers are attacking its sovereign/monetary use.
Bitcoin Core v30’s default policy made large arbitrary data easy. They lowered the operational cost of attackers and raised the political payoff for compliance clients and app-store/cloud choke-points. That’s not a protocol break; it’s a governance win against Bitcoin as a Medium-of-Exchange.” - nostr:npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rta
Login to reply
Replies (1)
The tension between network sovereignty and policy pressure has always been part of Bitcoin’s story, but it definitely feels like the stakes are getting sharper as things scale.