IF NEWS ARE FAKE IMAGINE HISTORY
Login to reply
Replies (31)
Any good source for the correct history?
memory
Probably in the Vatican library.
But we don’t have access, almost nobody does 😳
99% fake
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
I always thought this
You cant believe nothing
I just thought of “Another Roadside Attraction” by Tom Robbins
Assassin monks.
Discovered secret in the catacombs of the Vatican.
The secret could destroy the power of the Church hidden for nearly 2 millennia.
You’ll have to sell it to me a little more
Sorry Amigo. I don’t do that.
So you get it.
Nice.
🧡👊🏻🍻
Check out “My Lunch Break”
We have NO FUCKING CLUE
🚨 Finally, we're getting it!🚨
View quoted note →
Depends on which specific History you're looking for? There's a lot of podcasts off late, uncovering the Truth. Or at least, telling it like it is.
We post some on our profile sometimes.
The real history of humanity. What the fuck are we? Who was here before us? What’s really going on? It’s obvious that the oficial version doesn’t make any sense and science cannot explain any part of it
Was it Henry Ford who said, "History is bunk."
true
as clueless as they come.
“Are” is an interesting choice of word
“Tragedy and Hope” and “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley
Also Antony Sutton’s books
Travel
The only verifiable history is on our beloved blockchain. Everything else is up for debate even modern history
Think of history as a blockchain
Well, right now we're at a fork that's a shitcoin (a lie)
We have to rejoin the original chain (the truth)
What exactly is there, the fake news? Bitcoin is not a spam dump. Bitcoin is Freedom Money.
I don’t understand what your taking away from my post. I’m saying the only verifiable truth of events that we have is the transactions held on the bitcoin blockchain.
I hope you mean monetary transactions and not data storage. Some Coretards put a lot of spam on Bitcoin and use this as excuse. Its a lie. I agree that Bitcoin is the monetary truth signal in terms of the economy.
I mean monitory transactions, nothing else.
❤❤❤
Also just to clarify, I am not against small amounts of data on Bitcoin lets say up to 40 or even 80 Bytes.
SHA256 is 32 Bytes. A person can download the whole Wikipedia (idk, lets say 1 TB of data, put it in one torrent file and share it with the world, make a sha256 hash of it that is 32 Bytes, put it on Bitcoin and that will be the evidence of it and also a way that it can't be changed. If it is changed the hash won't match.
But putting big amounts of data on Bitcoin is just spam and an attack on Bitcoin Freedom Money.
There is no way of Bitcoin being money and having the whole Wkipedia in OP_RETURN. That will centralize Bitcoin and make it Ethereum 2.0. Also think if Wikipedia is possible to stuff then all pornography will also be possible to stuff.
You’re defending arguments that aren’t being made here man, it was a joke about the Bitcoin blockchain being verifiable and true. Nothing more, nothing less. Be easy friend