Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 2
Generated: 22:32:13
No hate here, no beef in that barbecue, just say it like I see it, you believe what you want to believe and if you consider the stabilisment F1 journalist analysis are valid, good for you. For me just an enormous effort to justify what the majority thinks, it is rigged. And their justification a pile of shit they were paid to pedal. Go listen to Piastri's comments were he explicitly says he does not understand where the pace of his car went. On a side note, today during Laa Vegas quali was checking the on board sound of Norris car and compare it with the one of Piastri. The one from Norris sounds like a Formula E, an annoying sound... The one from Piastri like all the other cars, a F1... Favoritism is just human nature, unavoidable, sports corruption and arranged games, fights and races is obviously happening and will continue to happen, we have examples in F1 as the Flabio Briattori Gate, removed for making a driver to crash to favor his team mate Alonso... And yet, the guy is back, that alone speaks volumes of the sport and how is managed.
2025-11-22 19:16:44 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (2)

The difference in the sound of cars from the same team has been discussed many times, and in most cases, the difference is explained by different car settings and driver preferences. I also noticed a pronounced whistle from Norris's onboard, but I don't consider this evidence of a decisive difference in the cars' technical characteristics. But I heard an opinion that the last updates of the season, which McLaren brought in at rounds 7-9 before the end of the championship, introduced decisive changes that were much more suitable for Norris, Piastri's weeks. I agree that favoritism for brit is evident, it's obvious, but I don't believe that the team is sabotaging Piastri, preventing him from revealing his talent, especially that they have different cars. Piastri would never agree with old details. And if one driver have a new front wing/brakes/suspension or anything, but his partner is not, the team explain it immediately after the mandatory registration of any changes in it's cars between races. FIA and F1 owners are political, profit-oriented and likely corrupted institutions. I agree Briatore needed to be banned from racing business for life after what he did. Behind the scenes, a lot of what could be called match-fixing happens, whether for the sake of high ratings, spectacle, or drama. But in this particular case, even though I like the calm Oscar more than the whiny Lando, I see no reason to consider Formula 1 a failing sport. You say you stopped watching it in favor of F2, but you still watch. It seems to me that in recent years, with Max becoming king, the championship has become much more interesting and the intrigue has increased exponentially. Even if it's partly artificial, I don't care. I think it's long been clear that in Formula 1, you can't be a nobody; you can't win races only on pure talent. It's long been a sport for billionaires, allowed into which the children of millionaires are allowed, who are expected to be able to elbow each other and weave intrigues from the very childhood. In any case, time will put everything in its place. Thanks for the interesting opinion!
2025-11-23 03:20:39 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Good take, and yes, I stop watching as often as before and going to races, but, there is always that friend that want to watch and I endulge. Still enjoying F2 way more. And what is your take on Verstapen's team mates poor performance, the difference is abysmal, I confess Verstapen is one of my favorite drivers of all times but that difference is suspect
2025-11-23 04:13:25 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply