GM, Quantum Theory is just a “fractionally reserved” (fiat) model of physics.
Therefore Quantum Computing is really just Keynesian Computing on “fractionally reserved” (superposed) quantum states, where the same unit is assumed to exist in multiple “states” at once, just like fiat assumes a single deposit can back countless claims.
Lol, decoherence is the feature, not the bug.
Replies (5)
Maybe they'll be able to send a new manned mission to the moon with power of quantum lol
To me, too, this whole quantum thing smells like 💯% fiat but maybe I'm just a future quantum luddite.
It’s built on an incoherent theory of fractional commitment, the belief that unmeasured potential states can be treated as real physical states, that superposition is a kind of “double-spending” of existence. All of it rests on a model that never defines what a measurement actually is. A theory Bitcoin has been openly falsifying for the last sixteen years without any recognition. The double spend problem is a physics problem.
It’s time we actually stand behind Bitcoin and what its physics reveal. Right now, we’re losing the narrative war. If the trend continues, you’ll be handed PQC “upgrades” the same way the world was handed fiat:
For your safety and convenience, of course.
Interesting take. Great analogy too
It’s a tough to find a language most people can understand. I assume every Bitcoiner knows the problem with fractional reserve systems.
Just apply the same knowledge to physics.
😂
